• COM3: Existing concrete

    COM3: Existing Concrete Structures

  • COM3: Existing concrete

    COM3: Existing Concrete Structures

Motivation

The goal of Commission 3 (COM3) is to define appropriate and reliable procedures to establish the safety of existing structures and any associated requirements for interventions to extend the safe operation or working life of such structures.

Scope and objective of technical work

COM3 will deliver this through the preparation of comprehensive guidance for the assessment of existing concrete structures, providing complementary recommendations to those given in the fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010 (fib MC2010), which was prepared primarily for the design of new concrete structures. To that end, COM3 will produce documents supporting the development of fib Model Code 2020 (fib MC2020) to be used for the assessment of the present structural performance and the prediction and evaluation of future structural performance of existing concrete structures with or without damage and/or revised operational requirements, together with any associated interventions required to extend their service life. It is envisaged that the documents to be produced could include technical reports, reviews of the state-of-the-art and technical history/evolution, technical guidelines, specifications and recommendations. 

Currently, within the tasks groups of the commission further developments are made to extend, broaden, deepen and harmonize the recently developed guidelines within fib Model Code 2020.

 

Matthews StuartCommission Chair
Alfred Strauss
Giuseppe ManciniDeputy Chair
Robby Caspeele

First name Last name Country Affiliation
Joost Walraven Netherlands Dutch fib Delegation
Miroslav Sykora Czech Republic Czech Technical University in Prague, Klokner Institute
Alfred Strauss Austria BOKU University
Raphael Steenbergen Netherlands TNO Structures and Safety
Giuseppe Mancini Italy Politecnico Torino
Gerrie Dieteren Netherlands TNO
David Fernández-Ordóñez Switzerland fib
Stuart Matthews United Kingdom Matthews Consulting
Sylvia Kessler Germany Helmut-Schmidt-University/ University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg
José Campos e Matos Portugal University of Minho
Thomas Braml Germany Universität der Bundeswehr München
Tamon Ueda China Shenzhen University
Robby Caspeele Belgium Ghent University
Dario Coronelli Italy Politecnico di Milano
Agnieszka Bigaj-van Vliet Netherlands TNO - Buildings, Infrastructures and Maritime
Wouter Botte Belgium Ghent University
Takumi Shimomura Japan Nagaoka Univ. of Technology
Kamyab Zandi Canada TIMEZYX, Canada | Sweden
Maria Pina Limongelli Italy Politecnico di MIlano

  • TG3.1 - Reliability and safety evaluation: full-probabilistic and semi-probabilistic methods for existing structures

    fib Task Group 3.1 (TG3.1) focuses on the reliability and safety evaluation of existing structures and focuses on the development of risk and reliability target levels for assessment and retrofitting, the full-probabilistic modelling of the structural safety and semi-probabilistic assessment methods for existing structures. In the framework of development of fib MC, TG 3.1 is revising also basis of structural design.

    The TG aims to (i) resolve pending questions with respect to the full-probabilistic assessment and target safety levels for the assessment and retrofitting of existing structures, and (ii) support the risk and reliability related questions arising due to the developments in TG3.2, TG3.3 and TG3.4.

    In probabilistic assessment of degrading structures, TG3.1 is cooperating with COM8, mainly through TG8.8.2.

    Working topics include:

    • Risk acceptance and decision-making for existing structures
    • Probabilistic models and Bayesian updating framework for the assessment of existing structures
    • Full-probabilistic and semi-probabilistic reliability analysis of new and existing structures

    Raphaël SteenbergenConvener
    Raphaël Steenbergen

    First name Last name Country Affiliation
    Dimitris Diamantidis Germany Fachhochschule Regensburg
    Diego Lorenzo Allaix Netherlands TNO Neitherlands
    Miguel Prieto Sweden RISE Research Institutes of Sweden
    Marcus Achenbach Germany LGA KdöR
    Max Hendriks Netherlands Delft University of Technology
    Giuseppe Mancini Italy Politecnico Torino
    Alfred Strauss Austria BOKU University
    Miroslav Sykora Czech Republic Czech Technical University in Prague, Klokner Institute
    Raphael Steenbergen Netherlands TNO Structures and Safety
    David Fernández-Ordóñez Switzerland fib
    Peter Tanner Spain Cesma Ingenieros, SL
    José Campos e Matos Portugal University of Minho
    Paolo Castaldo Italy Politecnico di Torino
    Diego Gino Italy Politecnico di Torino
    Carlos Paul Lara Sarache Spain Instituto Eduardo Torroja
    Wouter Botte Belgium Ghent University
    Filippo Sangiorgio Sweden Lektus
    Aurelio Muttoni Switzerland École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPF Lausanne)
    Mayer Melhem Australia Monash University
    João André Portugal Portuguese National Laboratory for Civil Engineering
    Robby Caspeele Belgium Ghent University
    Pierre van der Spuy South Africa Stellenbosch University
    Qianhui Yu China École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPF Lausanne)
    Giorgio Monti Italy Sapienza Università di Roma
    Oladimeji Olalusi South Africa University of Kwazulu-Natal
    Pathmanathan Rajeev Australia Swinburne University of Technology
    Ramon Hingorani Norway SINTEF
    Elena Miceli Italy Politecnico Torino
    Hélder Manuel Silva Sousa Portugal HS Consulting
    Lenganji Simwanda Czech Republic Czech Technical University in Prague
    Morten Engen Norway Multiconsult AS
    Rein de Vries Netherlands TU Delft
    Chao Jiang China Tongji University

  • TG3.2 - Modeling of structural performance of existing concrete structures

    It is widely understood and accepted that existing concrete structures are different entities to contemporary new concrete structures. There are numerous flexibilities inherent to the process of the design of new concrete structures and in their construction. Existing structures are entities that can, in principle, be interrogated and assessed to establish their actual nature and condition. However, such processes have their difficulties and uncertainties and it is in fact often very difficult to interrogate an existing structure. These difficulties increase when an existing structure has experienced damage or deterioration. Accordingly, substantial and different uncertainties remain with respect to existing structures and these uncertainties need to be taken into account in the structural assessment process.

    During recent years Task Group 3.2 has distinguished three main areas relevant for the determination of the structural behaviour of existing structures:

    • The real bearing capacity of existing structures: in order to make as much as possible use of the residual bearing capacity of existing structures, advanced behavioural models are necessary;
    • The bearing capacity of structures with components damaged due to deterioration;
    • The bearing capacity of structures designed on the basis of old codes or recommendations, not anymore meeting the actual state of the art.

    A state of the art bulletin dealing with the subjects mentioned previously has recently been produced by TG 3.2. For the forthcoming period focus will be directed to aspects that have turned out to be important, but suffer from the absence of particular knowledge. This applies particularly to:

    • The bearing capacity of structures with corroded reinforcement;
    • Optimizing proof-loading procedures and interpretation of the results;
    • Optimum use of the Levels of Approximation approach when assessing structural safety, serviceability and remaining service life.


    Dario CoronelliConvener
    Dario Coronelli
    Kamyab ZandiCo-Convener
    Kamyab Zandi

    First name Last name Country Affiliation
    Max Hendriks Netherlands Delft University of Technology
    Daniel Dunkelberg Germany Pirlet & Partner Ingenieurgesellschaft mbh
    Beatrice Belletti Italy Univ. degli Studi di Parma - Engineering and Architecture
    Carmen Andrade Spain Centre Internacional de Mètodes Numèrics en l’Ènginyeria (CIMNE)
    Zila Rinaldi Italy University of Rome “Tor Vergata”
    Alfred Strauss Austria BOKU University
    Gerrie Dieteren Netherlands TNO
    Daia Zwicky Switzerland Univ. of Applied Sciences Fribourg
    Ane de Boer Netherlands Ane de Boer Consultancy
    Christis Chrysostomou Cyprus Cyprus University of Technology
    Stuart Matthews United Kingdom Matthews Consulting
    David Fernández-Ordóñez Switzerland fib
    Yuguang Yang Netherlands TU Delft
    Francesco Tondolo Italy Politecnico di Torino
    Tamon Ueda China Shenzhen University
    Hikaru Nakamura Japan Nagoya University
    Dario Coronelli Italy Politecnico di Milano
    Marta Del Zoppo Italy University of Naples Federico II
    Camillo Nuti Italy Università degli Studi Roma Tre
    Kamyab Zandi Canada TIMEZYX, Canada | Sweden
    Giuseppe Di Nunzio Italy -
    Miguel Prieto Sweden RISE Research Institutes of Sweden
    Attila Vardai Hungary NYUGTAN Mernoki Szolgaltato Kft.
    Eva Lantsoght Ecuador Universidad San Francisco de Quito
    Davide Lavorato Italy Università Roma Tre, Italia
    Isabel Martínez Sierra Spain Consejo Superior de Investig. Cientificas
    Hyunjin Ju Korea, Republic of Hankyong National University
    Ivan Markovic Switzerland Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences / Ostschweizer Fachhochschule Rapperswil
    Elena Casprini Italy University
    Adriano Castagnone Italy STA DATA Structural Software
    Lorenzo FRANCESCHINI Italy -
    Joost Walraven Netherlands Dutch fib Delegation
    Alberto Meda Italy University of Rome “Tor Vergata”
    Zanyar Mirzaei Switzerland Pini Gruppe AG
    Fabio di Carlo Italy University of Rome Tor Vergata
    Simone Ravasini Italy University of Parma
    Ignasi Fernandez Sweden -
    Mohammad Mehdi Kashani United Kingdom Associate Professor of Structural Engineering
    Vladyslav Shekhovtsov Ukraine Odesa State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture
    Sana Amir United Arab Emirates University of Wollongong in Dubai, Delft University of Technology
    Hugo Rodrigues Portugal University of Aveiro
    Adolfo Rincón Spain ETYSER S.L.

    • WP3.2.1 - Assessment of half joints
       
      A half joint is a structural solution that is known to be problematic. The lack of structural redundancy deems these elements critical, as seen in collapsing of the Concorde bridge in Canada and the Annone bridge in Italy. In practice, engineers are facing various challenges when assessing the safety of such structures. These challenges mainly fall into the following aspects
       
      This task group will focus on the structural analysis, assessment and monitoring of half joint. To be more specific, the following aspects will be covered:
      • Modelling techniques for half joints, with complex geometry and reinforcement design. Examples are: half joints with distributed hanger and diagonal reinforcement, half joint plate structures combined with torsional moment in width direction. The approaches include: strut-and-tie methods, kinematically based methods and numerical modelling.
      • Modelling of half joints with typical non-conforming detailing’s: diagonal and horizontal reinforcement with insufficient anchorage, hanger reinforcement bent in wrong direction, hanger reinforcement with insufficient anchorage, etc.
      • Advanced inspection methods for internal damage (cracking) of half joints. This includes inspection methods for internal crack and corrosion damage.
      • Modelling the residual capacity of half joints with known corrosion damage.
      • The development of an estimation tool for the global structural reliability based on inspection data and damage-based half joint models.
       

      Yuguang Yang Convener
      Yuguang Yang

      First name Last name Country Affiliation
      Yuguang Yang Netherlands TU Delft
      David Fernández-Ordóñez Switzerland fib
      Robby Caspeele Belgium Ghent University
      Rob Vergoossen Netherlands Haskoning
      Anssi Laaksonen Finland Tampere University of Technology
      Dario Coronelli Italy Politecnico di Milano
      Marco di Prisco Italy Politecnico di Milano
      Maurizio Orlando Italy Università degli Studi di Firenze
      Boyan Mihaylov Belgium University of Liege
      Zila Rinaldi Italy University of Rome “Tor Vergata”
      Beatrice Belletti Italy Univ. degli Studi di Parma - Engineering and Architecture
      Fengqiao Zhang Netherlands TU Delft

  • TG3.3 - Existing Concrete Structures: Life Management, Testing and Structural Health Monitoring

    The Task Group 3.3 (TG 3.3) specifies and extends their focus in the framework of Non-Destructive-Testing (NDT) and Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) required for the through-life management of existing concrete structures according to the following:

    • Concepts for extension of service life of reinforced concrete structures supported by NDT and SHM;
    • Specific testing/ specific monitoring; testing/ techniques combined with autonomous robotic systems (remote monitoring systems) or based on digital images as well as innovative self-monitoring materials (repair, strengthening);
    • Monitoring of site-specific load actions (e.g. traffic loads, etc.);
    • Data management for reinforced concrete structures using NDT/SHM: data reporting and data analysis of NDT/SHM applying AI;
    • Reliability assessment of NDT/SHM methods applied on reinforced concrete;
    • Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Digital Twins (DT) for existing concrete structures as a decision-making tool using NDT/SHM data; implementation of SHM in BIM;
    • Decision-making on structural level to foster the transformation from periodic to predictive/preventive maintenance including the assessment on the environmental impact of the decision: How can NDT/SHM contribute to operate our infrastructure in the most sustainable way?
    • SHM guidelines for newly designed complex concrete structures concerning their exploitation phase, also including BIM and DT.

    Sylvia KesslerConvener
    Sylvia Kessler
    vCo-Convener
    Maria Pina Limongelli

    First name Last name Country Affiliation
    Gabriele Bertagnoli Italy Politecnico di Torino
    David Lehky Czech Republic Brno University of Technology
    Drahomir Novak Czech Republic Technical University of Brno
    Stefan Maas Luxembourg Université du Luxembourg
    Thomas Petraschek Austria OBB-Infrastruktur AG
    Mark Alexander Ahrens Germany Ruhr-Univ. Bochum
    Michael Hansen Germany Leibniz Universität Hannover
    Davide Lavorato Italy Università Roma Tre, Italia
    Geert Lombaert Belgium University of Leuven
    Marian Ralbosky Austria Austrian Research Institute
    Joost Gulikers Netherlands Rijkswaterstaat Centre for Infrastructure
    Giuseppe Mancini Italy Politecnico Torino
    Carmen Andrade Spain Centre Internacional de Mètodes Numèrics en l’Ènginyeria (CIMNE)
    Alberto Meda Italy University of Rome “Tor Vergata”
    Alfred Strauss Austria BOKU University
    Miroslav Sykora Czech Republic Czech Technical University in Prague, Klokner Institute
    Gerrie Dieteren Netherlands TNO
    Jonathon Dyson Australia BCRC
    Brett Pielstick United States Eisman & Russo
    Stuart Matthews United Kingdom Matthews Consulting
    David Fernández-Ordóñez Switzerland fib
    Sylvia Kessler Germany Helmut-Schmidt-University/ University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg
    Peter Tanner Spain Cesma Ingenieros, SL
    José Campos e Matos Portugal University of Minho
    Giorgio Monti Italy Sapienza Università di Roma
    Francesco Tondolo Italy Politecnico di Torino
    Thomas Braml Germany Universität der Bundeswehr München
    Joan Casas Rius Spain Tech. Univ. of Catalunya, UPC-BarcelonaTech
    Marcin Górski Poland Silesian University of Technology
    Robby Caspeele Belgium Ghent University
    Eftychia Apostolidi Germany Donges SteelTec GmbH
    Chris Hendy United Kingdom Atkins
    Manfred Keuser Germany BUNG Ingenieure A
    Milan Holicky Czech Republic Czech Techn. Univ. of Prague - CVUT
    Camillo Nuti Italy Università degli Studi Roma Tre
    Marcus Hoffmann Austria Transport Infrastructure Asset Management
    Emilio Bastidas-Arteaga France Universite de Nantes
    Tamon Ueda China Shenzhen University
    Florian Zimmert Germany Bundeswehr University Munich
    Frédéric Duprat France INSA Toulouse
    A. Emin Aktan United States Drexel University
    Jan Bien Poland Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
    Véronique Bouteiller France University Gustave Eiffel
    Necati Catbas United States University of Central Florida
    Mehmet Celebi United States USGS
    Eleni Chatzi Switzerland ETH Zurich
    De Roeck Guido Belgium KU Leuven
    Ivan Duvnjak Croatia University of Zagreb
    Lennart Elfgren Sweden Luleå University of Technology
    Bruno Godart France Gustave Eiffel University
    Maria Pina Limongelli Italy Politecnico di MIlano
    Franklin Moon United States Rutgers School of Engineering
    Luis Oliveira Santos Portugal LNEC
    Miguel Prieto Sweden RISE Research Institutes of Sweden
    Muhammad Imran Rafiq United Kingdom University of Brighton
    Peter Rosko Austria Technical University of Vienna
    Franziska Schmidt France Université Gustave Eiffel, MAST/EMGCU
    Roberto Torrent Switzerland Quali- Ti-Mat Sagl
    Jorge Ley Urzaiz Spain INTEMAC
    Daniele Zonta Italy University of Trento
    Marko Bartolac Croatia University of Zagreb
    Ruiz De Azua Spain Kinesia Structural Monitoring
    Elsa Eustáquio Portugal Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil
    Stefan Küttenbaum Germany Universität der Bundeswehr München
    Stefan Maack Germany Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung
    Lisa Ptacek (Mold) Austria Universität für Bodenkultur
    Jiazeng Shan China Tongji University
    Helmut Wenzel Austria VCE
    Volkmar Zabel Germany Bauhaus University Weimar
    Konrad Bergmeister Austria Univ. Bodenkultur
    Giovanni Volpatti Switzerland Bluewin
    Diogo Ribeiro Portugal University of Porto
    Muhammed Basheer United Kingdom University of Leeds
    Alois Vorwagner Austria AIT- Austrian Institute of Technology
    Mieszko Kużawa Poland Wroclaw University of Technology
    Adriano Castagnone Italy STA DATA Structural Software
    Els Verstrynge Belgium KU Leuven
    Hélder Manuel Silva Sousa Portugal HS Consulting
    Helder Filipe Moreira de Sousa Portugal Brisa Group
    Francesca Marsili Germany Helmut-Schmidt-University/ University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg
    Christian Kainz Germany Bundeswehruni München
    Marco Civera Italy Politecnico di Torino, Department of Structural, Geotechnical and Building Engineering
    Mario Torcinaro Spain RWE Renewables Iberia
    George Wardeh France Un. de Cergy-Pontoise
    Danièle Waldmann-Diederich Germany Technical University of Darmstadt
    Eline Vereecken Belgium Hasselt University
    Numa Joy Bertola Luxembourg University Luxemburg
    Katrin Beyer Switzerland EPFL
    Antonio Bilotta Italy University of Naples Federico II
    Xilin Lu China Tongji University
    Juan Carlos Pantoja Moyano Portugal Minho University
    Juan Mauricio Lozano Valcarcel Germany Technical University of Munich
    Jiehui Wang Hong Kong City University of Hong Kong
    Firas AL MAHMOUD France Université de Lorraine, CNRS, IJL, F-54000 Nancy, France
    Yannick Igor Fogue Djombou France -
    Gabriel Gazale Italy -
    Peter Paulik Slovakia Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
    Tim Soetens Belgium Sanacon
    Ronur Krishnappa Jaigopal India -

  • TG3.4 - Selection and implementation of interventions/through-life management activities and measures for concrete structures

    The focus is on the selection and implementation of interventions and through-life management activities and measures for concrete structures.

    The following aspects related to the intervention are addressed:

    • Definition of intervention
    • Types of intervention methods
    • Selection method for intervention
    • Information needed for design/execution of intervention and method for collecting information
    • Materials for intervention
    • Design method for intervention
    • Execution method for intervention
    • Assessment of performance after the intervention
    • Maintenance and re-intervention of structures after intervention
    • Sustainability aspects of interventions

    Norbert RandlConvener
    Norbert Randl
    Giuseppe ManciniCo-Convener
    Giuseppe Mancini

    First name Last name Country Affiliation
    Etsuji Kikuta Japan Civil Engineering Research Institute for Cold Region
    Dawei Zhang China Zhejiang University
    Philip McKenna Ireland Halcrow Group Ltd., a CH2M HILL Company
    Giuseppe Mancini Italy Politecnico Torino
    Carmen Andrade Spain Centre Internacional de Mètodes Numèrics en l’Ènginyeria (CIMNE)
    Amir Rahimi Germany Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau
    Jan Vítek Czech Republic Metrostav a. s.
    Lojze Bevc Slovenia ZAG Slovenije
    Koichi Kobayashi Japan Gifu University
    Jonathon Dyson Australia BCRC
    Attila Vardai Hungary NYUGTAN Mernoki Szolgaltato Kft.
    Francesco Bencardino Italy University of Calabria
    Christoph Gehlen Germany TUM School of Engineering and Design
    Frank Papworth Australia BCRC
    David Fernández-Ordóñez Switzerland fib
    Meini Su United Kingdom University of Manchester
    Thanasis Triantafillou Greece University of Patras
    Xilin Lu China Tongji University
    Costantino Menna Italy University of Naples Federico II
    Norbert Randl Austria Carinthia Univ. of Applied Sciences
    Hikaru Nakamura Japan Nagoya University
    Tamon Ueda China Shenzhen University
    Anna Saetta Italy Università Iuav di Venezia
    Marco Savoia Italy University of Bologna
    Ji-hua Zhu China Shenzhen University
    Hugo Corres Spain FHECOR Ingenieros Consultores
    Marta Del Zoppo Italy University of Naples Federico II
    Takumi Shimomura Japan Nagaoka Univ. of Technology
    Alessio Cascardi Italy University of Salento
    Isabel Martínez Sierra Spain Consejo Superior de Investig. Cientificas
    Zanyar Mirzaei Switzerland Pini Gruppe AG
    Justin Shrestha Taiwan, Province of China Shenzhen University
    Alessandro Palmeri Germany -

  • TG3.5 - Forensic engineering

    We have an enormous and an ever-increasing heritage of reinforced and prestressed concrete structures, many of which are currently approaching the end of their intended service life. However, there are pressing societal, economic and environmental needs to safely extend the service lives of many of these structures. This poses a delicate and challenging task if we are to make appropriate decisions on the through-life management and care of these constructed assets to achieve this while avoiding transferring an excessive burden onto the next generation. To do this we need a better understanding of the real behaviours of structures, why they may not achieved the required performance and, ultimately, what may cause them to fail.

    Scope:

    • To advance the use of techniques, processes and procedures employed in forensic engineering studies and to undertake forensic investigations – the scientific and engineering process.
    • Examine how forensic engineering studies can provide improved understanding of the performance and behaviours of constructed assets (i.e. the lessons learned), with the goals of formulating improved models, identifying deficiencies / limitations and desired improvements in professional practice, etc including (amongst others) those concerned with:
      • Structural safety and performance
      • The economic aspects of performance / through-life cost (potentially in conjunction with TG8.4)
      • Post-fire assessment of existing buildings (in conjunction with TG2)
      • Durability aspects (in conjunction with COM8)
    • To facilitate feedback from the understanding gained from forensic engineering studies into professional practice to improve the through-life performance of structures and buildings, such as the achievement of performance requirements, durability etc. This would include liaison and feedback as appropriate to fib Commissions and other collaborating bodies.
    • Investigate how the provisions of fib MC2020 / the fib Model Code for Concrete Structures facilitate forensic investigations and the benefits arising thereof.
    • To advise what changes / additions are required in future editions of the fib Model Code for Concrete Structures from the understanding gained from forensic engineering studies and to facilitate the application of forensic engineering / forensic investigations of structural condition and performance.
    • To work with other fib Commissions / other bodies as appropriate


    Daniele ZontaConvener
    Daniele Zonta
     Frank PapworthCo-Convener
    Frank Papworth

    First name Last name Country Affiliation
    Daniele Zonta Italy University of Trento
    ab van den bos Netherlands NLyse
    Ehsan Noroozinejad Australia Western Sydney University
    Hans-Dieter Beushausen South Africa University of Cape Town
    Eugen Brühwiler Switzerland EPFL
    Ted Donchev United Kingdom Kingston University
    Roberto Felicetti Italy Politecnico di Milano
    Frank Papworth Australia BCRC
    Alfred Strauss Austria BOKU University
    Maria Pina Limongelli Italy Politecnico di MIlano
    Fabrizio Palmisano Italy PPV Consulting Studio Palmisano Perilli Associati
    Peter Robery United Kingdom Robery Forensic Engineering Ltd
    Branko Glisic United States Princeton University
    Johannes Hübl Austria University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences
    Necati Catbas United States University of Central Florida
    Hani Nassif United States Rutgers University-New Brunswick
    Luca Possidente Italy -
    Eva Lantsoght Ecuador Universidad San Francisco de Quito
    Mattia Bado Italy -
    Jörg-Martin Hohberg Switzerland Freelance Auditor
    Andreas Lampropoulos United Kingdom University of Brighton
    João André Portugal Portuguese National Laboratory for Civil Engineering
    ab van den bos Netherlands NLyse
    Umesh Rajeshirke India Spectrum Techno Consultants Pvt. Ltd
    Fulvio Parisi Italy University of Naples Federico II
    Venkataramana Heggade India Indian National Academy of Engineers
    Giovanni Volpatti Switzerland Bluewin
    Leandro Moretti Sanchez Canada University of Ottawa
    Christos Giarlelis Greece EQUIDAS Consulting Engineers

  • TG3.6 - Quality Management of Concrete Structures

    Quality Management (QM) can be defined as the systematic planning and control of processes concerning their quality through suitable activities and measures to achieve the required product or service standards. In business, QM refers to a management function that incorporates all organisational measures to monitor and improve processes and thus achieve the required product and service quality standards.

    Scope:

    From the state of the art, a comprehensive QM framework must involve key dimensions to ensure that C&RC structures meet the required standards and perform as expected over their lifespan. A general framework will be established to relate the principles of quality management to the realization of specific safety levels, as well as environmental and other targets. The importance of competence among all involved personnel will be highlighted, as performance is often hindered by a lack of understanding rather than intent. More precisely, this includes (Figure 1):

    • Material Quality: Ensuring that the concrete and reinforcements meet the specified standards and are made from high-quality materials through certified processes.
    • Design Quality: Ensuring that the structural design adheres to relevant codes and standards, and it can withstand the expected loads and environmental conditions.
    • Construction Quality: Ensuring the construction process, including explicit quality control measures, follows the design specifications and quality standards.
    • Inspection and Testing: Ensuring inspection and testing to verify that the materials and construction processes meet the required standards.
    • Documentation and Record Keeping: Ensuring the maintenance of detailed records of all materials, tests, inspections, and construction activities, including the creation of an as-built "Birth Certificate".
    • Training and Competence: Ensuring that all personnel involved in the design and construction process are adequately trained, competent, and qualified.
    • Health and Safety: Ensuring that all construction activities are carried out safely, protecting the health and safety of workers and the public.
    • Environmental Considerations: Ensuring the construction process minimises impact on the environment.
    • Structural Robustness: Ensuring that quality management processes contribute to assuring overall structural robustness against unforeseen events.


    Alfred StraussConvener
    Alfred Strauss
    Konrad BergmeisterCo-Convener
    Konrad Bergmeister

    First name Last name Country Affiliation
    David Fernández-Ordóñez Switzerland fib
    Alfred Strauss Austria BOKU University
    Konrad Bergmeister Austria Univ. Bodenkultur
    Helder Filipe Moreira de Sousa Portugal Brisa Group

  • TG3.7 - Integrated Limit State Assessment and Expert Framework for Existing Concrete Structures

    Within the activities on existing concrete structures, it has been agreed to establish Task Group TG 3.7, addressing both the development of a comprehensive verification framework and the clarification of expert involvement in the assessment process.

    Scope:

    The overall aim of TG 3.7 is to develop a practice-oriented limit state verification framework for the assessment of existing concrete structures, while also defining the roles, responsibilities, and required expert input throughout the assessment process. The framework will integrate all relevant aspects from data acquisition and measurements through to limit state verification, taking due account of recent developments within fib in relation to durability, structural assessment, reliability-based approaches, repair and strengthening. It will also appropriately consider specific characteristics of existing structures, such as uncertainties, spatial variability, and the updating of information based on additional knowledge (e.g. inspection and monitoring).


    Alfred StraussConvener
    Alfred Strauss
    Beatrice BellettiCo-Convener
    Beatrice Belletti
     Robby CaspeeleCo-Convener
    Robby Caspeele

    First name Last name Country Affiliation
    David Fernández-Ordóñez Switzerland fib
    Alfred Strauss Austria BOKU University
    Robby Caspeele Belgium Ghent University
    Beatrice Belletti Italy Univ. degli Studi di Parma - Engineering and Architecture

    • WP3.7.1 - Integrated Limit State Verification Framework for Existing Concrete Structures
       
      The assessment of existing reinforced and prestressed concrete structures is becoming increasingly important due to the ageing of infrastructure worldwide, increasing maintenance demands, sustainability requirements, and the need for safe and economically efficient service life extension strategies. In contrast to the design of new structures, the assessment of existing structures requires the explicit consideration of uncertainties related to material properties, structural detailing, deterioration processes, construction quality, loading history, and incomplete documentation. At the same time, additional knowledge obtained through inspections, testing, measurements, and monitoring allows uncertainties to be progressively reduced and structural reliability to be updated.
       
      The framework will be developed for different Levels of Approximation (LoA), ranging from semi-probabilistic to fully probabilistic approaches, and will include:
      • time-dependent aspects of degradation processes using annual verification concepts;
      • uncertainties in deterioration initiation and propagation phases;
      • updating procedures based on inspection and monitoring information;
      • qualitative and quantitative assessment approaches depending on the extent and severity of deterioration.
       

      Robby CaspeeleConvener
      Robby Caspeele
      Alfred StraussCo-convener
      Alfred Strauss
      Beatrice BellettiConvener
      Beatrice Belletti

      First name Last name Country Affiliation
      David Fernández-Ordóñez Switzerland fib
      Robby Caspeele Belgium Ghent University
      Alfred Strauss Austria BOKU University
      Beatrice Belletti Italy Univ. degli Studi di Parma - Engineering and Architecture

    • WP3.7.1 - Expert Roles and Responsibilities for the Assessment of Existing Concrete Structures
       
      The assessment of existing reinforced and prestressed concrete structures is a highly interdisciplinary process requiring the integration of expertise from structural engineering, materials science, durability assessment, inspection, monitoring, reliability analysis, repair engineering, and infrastructure management. In contrast to the design of new structures, the assessment of existing structures is characterized by incomplete information, uncertainties in structural behaviour and deterioration processes, and the necessity to continuously interpret and update information obtained from inspections, measurements, testing, and monitoring.
       
      The increasing complexity of assessment procedures, particularly when dealing with deteriorated and ageing structures, requires a clear definition of expert involvement throughout the entire assessment workflow. While technical methodologies for structural verification are continuously advancing, engineering practice still lacks harmonized guidance regarding:
      • the required expertise at the different stages of the assessment process;
      • the interaction between experts from different disciplines;
      • the interpretation and validation of assessment results;
      • the allocation of responsibilities;
      • and the integration of expert judgement into engineering decision-making.
       

      Alfred StraussCo-convener
      Alfred Strauss
      Robby CaspeeleConvener
      Robby Caspeele
      Beatrice BellettiConvener
      Beatrice Belletti

 

fib postal address

Ch. du Barrage, Station 18
CH-1015 Lausanne
Switzerland

Contact

p : +41 21 693 27 47
f : +41 21 693 62 45
e : info@fib-international.org
w : www.fib-international.org

Follow fib

Subscribe our newsletter

News

Follow us on
        

Join the fib

Join the fib